In immediate danger? Call 112 (emergency) or 101 (police). Not immediate danger but feeling unsafe? Call 1712 — free, anonymous.
ookmannen.be
NL FR EN
Professional listening to a male client

Why male victimhood is invisible

You have probably already encountered male victims without recognizing it — not through negligence, but because the lens still sees IPV as something that happens to women.

Introduction for professionals

As a professional, you come into contact with partner violence, sometimes explicitly and sometimes not. There is a good chance that you have already met male victims without recognizing it — not through negligence, but because the social lens still sees partner violence primarily as something that happens to women.

The figures

Source: Belgian EU-GBV survey (N=5800, age 18–74)
Form of violenceMenWomen
Ever a victim of intimate partner violence33.1%31.3%
Exclusively psychological violence74.1% of male victims23.5% of female victims
Combination of multiple forms23.5%48.7%

Police statistics 2024: 50,469 reports of intrafamilial violence — only 3% of victims report to police. The gap between population research and police statistics is an artifact of underreporting, not absence.

Why men don't report

  1. Shame and taboo — masculinity norms prohibit showing vulnerability
  2. Anticipating skepticism — justified fear of not being believed
  3. Victim-blaming — "you're bigger than her"
  4. Isolation — the partner has already cut them off from their network
  5. Counter-reporting — the partner has themselves filed a report
  6. Normalization — they think their situation is "not serious enough"

Epistemic injustice

"If a man and a woman tell exactly the same story, we generally tend to believe the woman faster and think along with her about solutions. Men are more often doubted. They also often hear that they should behave like a real man. So there is often victim-blaming too."

Experimental and qualitative research confirms that professionals too can follow gender scripts when assessing victimhood — with consequences for credibility, referral and interventions.

Recognizing signals

Recognizing signals? Assess the danger in a structured way with risk assessment.

Practical tools

Language and attitude

Screening questions

Always question both parties separately.

Why aggressors often cannot see their own behavior: read about context blindness.

Documenting injuries and impact (for physicians)

Careful documentation by the (family) doctor is often the only objective evidence male victims have. Principles:

Referral

Podcast

The invisible prison of male domestic abuse — a conversation about why male victimhood remains so difficult to recognise in professional care settings.


Frequently asked questions

How do I recognise a male victim of intimate partner violence?

Male victims show the same signs as female victims: withdrawal, nervousness around the partner, unexplained injuries, sudden financial difficulties and social isolation. A crucial difference: men tend to minimise more and rarely label their situation as 'partner violence'. Ask specifically about patterns of control, intimidation and fear.

What screening questions should I use when intimate partner violence is suspected?

Effective screening questions include: 'Do you feel your partner controls your behaviour or contacts?', 'Are you afraid of your partner's reaction to everyday things?', 'Has your partner ever threatened you — with the children, with filing a complaint, or with suicide?'. Always interview separately from the partner.

Why do male victims report intimate partner violence less often?

Three factors play a role: (1) gender norms — men are expected to be strong and self-reliant; (2) fear of not being believed or being labelled the perpetrator (DARVO risk); (3) structural barriers — support services have historically been oriented towards female victims. Only 3% of male victims file a report (EU-GBV survey, 2024).

Written by Koen Thomeer, general practitioner · Last updated: 14 July 2026